Should your camera's lens really rattle like that?

Olympus M.Zuiko 12‑40mm f/2.8 Pro lens on a wooden surface in front of green foliage
(Image credit: James Artaius)

I first noticed this with my Olympus M.Zuiko 12-40mm f/2.8 Pro. I’d knocked it off a table and, although it didn’t fall very far, I gave it a little shake to check nothing had come loose and there was a noticeable ‘clonk’ from inside. Not good!

I didn’t have another lens with me so I had to put it back on the camera to check it out and hope for the best. The shots were fine, which seemed weird, but then I noticed that with the lens on the camera and the camera powered up, the clonk was gone.

Its turns out this wasn’t a one-off. I now have a sample of the new version of this lens, the OM System M.Zuiko 12-40mm f/2.8 Pro II, and it’s exactly the same. This makes me think that there’s something else going on, and that there’s nothing broken at all. And the only explanation I can think of is that the lens doesn’t ‘park’ its focus group when it’s switched off, and that this focus group is left to ‘float’ until the lens is hooked up again.

I’m sure it’s perfectly harmless, but I don’t like it. Especially in a pro optic that’s one of the best MFT lenses on the market.

The Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR is a top-quality professional prime, but it's a 'clonker' (Image credit: Rod Lawton)

It’s not just this lens, either, as I found out when I reviewed the Fujinon XF23mmF1.4 R LM WR. This is a fabulous lens optically and handles really nicely too. Except that when it’s off the camera, this lens also makes a noticeable ‘clonking’ noise. There’s no optical stabilization in this lens so, again – so I can blame that. 

I’m guessing it’s the focus group ‘floating’ while there’s no power going to the lens. The XF23mm is one of the best Fujifilm lenses. It’s a professional lens, so this is not a bit of cheap corner-cutting.

I’m sure Fujifilm’s engineers have thought of all this and there’s absolutely no harm being caused to the internal elements. There are probably very good engineering reasons why it’s not practical to lock down internal elements when the lens isn’t being used. 

Knock knock. Who's there? Canon RF 85mm f/2 Macro IS STM. (Image credit: James Artaius)

Not every lens does this. My Canon RF 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM is probably not one of the best Canon RF lenses, but it is rattle-free, whether it’s on or off the camera, and this lens has an optical stabilization unit as well as a focus group. But then my Canon RF 85mm f/2 Macro IS STM DOES rattle when it’s powered off, so there doesn’t seem to be any real consistency about this.

This might seem like a terribly minor thing to complain about, but once you realize you’ve got a ‘clonking’ lens it’s quite difficult to get it out of your head. Nobody likes it when mechanical things rattle…

Rod Lawton
Contributor

Rod is an independent photography journalist and editor, and a long-standing Digital Camera World contributor, having previously worked as DCW's Group Reviews editor. Before that he has been technique editor on N-Photo, Head of Testing for the photography division and Camera Channel editor on TechRadar, as well as contributing to many other publications. He has been writing about photography technique, photo editing and digital cameras since they first appeared, and before that began his career writing about film photography. He has used and reviewed practically every interchangeable lens camera launched in the past 20 years, from entry-level DSLRs to medium format cameras, together with lenses, tripods, gimbals, light meters, camera bags and more. Rod has his own camera gear blog at fotovolo.com but also writes about photo-editing applications and techniques at lifeafterphotoshop.com

You must confirm your public display name before commenting

Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.