Can compact, lightweight camera gear be any good at wildlife photography? I took a 2.5lb / 1kg Sony kit to a wildlife refuge
I took the Sony A6700 and 70-350mm lens on a hike to photograph wildlife. I wasn't disappointed
I prefer wildlife photography spent hiking rather than sitting in a blind. The problem is that wildlife camera gear is often the heaviest – and priciest. Inspired by the launch of the latest bridge camera, the Sony RX10 V, I wanted to see if it was possible to build a lightweight mirrorless kit under 3lbs / 1.3kg.
I took the Sony A6700 with the FE 70-350mm f/4.5-6.3 G OSS to a wildlife refuge to see how a lightweight, crop-sensor mirrorless kit could perform for wildlife photography. I wasn’t disappointed.
Paired together, the A6700 with the 70-350mm weighs just over 36oz – or about 2.25lbs / 1kg. That’s a highly hikeable camera system. I ended up walking almost 2.5 miles / 4 kilometers with the kit on a fall afternoon. I probably would have gone even farther, but sunset comes fast in the fall.
I review cameras for a living, which means I’ve shot with a lot of the best telephoto lenses that I otherwise may not have been able to afford – including lenses that cost more than my first car and felt like carrying around a third leg.
It’s difficult to go from shooting with a 600mm lens to a zoom that maxes out at 350mm. But, the crop sensor edges the lens towards a 105-525mm equivalent. That’s not a bad reach considering the cost of the lens and how easy it is to carry around.
I did occasionally wish to get a little closer – which is the norm for me when I’m out photographing wildlife and too impatient to sit still for very long. That’s really what’s required to photograph wildlife with a shorter telephoto: more patience to wait for the creature to come close.
Yet, when I couldn’t get as close as I wanted, I ended up focusing on capturing more environmental portraits that show birds in their surroundings. I used the fall color to frame these distant but plentiful migrating sandhill cranes.
The best camera deals, reviews, product advice, and unmissable photography news, direct to your inbox!
Redwing blackbirds were also plentiful on my hike, and I didn’t mind not being quite as close while photographing them plucking seeds from fading flowers.
What I missed about using larger, pricier systems like the Sony A7 V with the 200-600mm f/5.6-6.3 G OSS or the new 400mm f/4.5 and 600mm f/6.3 primes is that the larger sensor allows for less noise at fast shutter speeds. That’s particularly noticeable when trying to crop in on the photos.
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
View Original
Last year, I tried three budget cameras from three brands for wildlife photography – a genre that’s notoriously difficult to do on a budget – including the Sony A6400.
The budget bodies and lenses did surprisingly well, illustrating just how far cheap cameras have come since the early DSLR days when my first APS-C DSLR shot just 3fps.
But the Sony A6400 has an older animal eye detection system, and I’ve been itching to try the Sony A6700 with a budget lens ever since. The A6700 with the 70-350mm lens didn’t disappoint, creating an easily hikeable kit.
You may also like
Take a look at the best cameras for wildlife photography or the best lenses for bird photography.
With more than a decade of experience writing about cameras and technology, Hillary K. Grigonis leads the US coverage for Digital Camera World. Her work has appeared in Business Insider, Digital Trends, Pocket-lint, Rangefinder, The Phoblographer, and more. Her wedding and portrait photography favors a journalistic style. She’s a former Nikon shooter and a current Fujifilm user, but has tested a wide range of cameras and lenses across multiple brands. Hillary is also a licensed drone pilot.
You must confirm your public display name before commenting
Please logout and then login again, you will then be prompted to enter your display name.