The Irix 11mm f/4 Blackstone is a well made and competitively priced ultrawide lens for full-frame Canon, Nikon and Pentax DSLRs. Image quality and handling are very good, but if our test sample lens is anything to go by, you may have to make some exposure corrections to compensate for the lens's imprecise aperture diaphragm control.
Why you can trust Digital Camera World
Our expert reviewers spend hours testing and comparing products and services so you can choose the best for you. Find out how we test.
Designed in Switzerland and built in South Korea, the Irix 11mm f/4 Blackstone is available in three mount options to fit full-frame Canon, Nikon or Pentax DSLRs, enabling an expansive 126-degree field of view on the diagonal.
The Irix 11mm f/4 is available in two editions. The Blackstone tested here is the premium edition with a metal barrel, while the Firefly variant incorporates exactly the same optics in a plastic shell that’s nearly 100g lighter, and has a lighter price tag, too. The Blackstone edition also distinguishes itself from its cheaper Firefly sibling by sporting engraved fluorescent markings on the lens barrel.
Specs
Mount: Canon EF, Nikon F, Pentax K Full frame: Yes
Lens construction: 16 elements in 10 groups Angle of view: 126 degrees Diaphragm blades: 9 Minimum aperture: f/22 Minimum focusing distance: 0.275m Maximum magnification ratio: 1:13 Filter size: rear gelatin only Dimensions: 118x103mm Weight: 790g
As this is a manual focus-only lens, the focus ring has a usefully long-travel to help with precise focusing, plus there's a locking ring and fine-tuning calibration. Though autofocus isn’t available, there are still on-board electronics that drive AF confirmation lamps in the viewfinder, and there are focus distance, depth of field and hyperfocal scales printed on the barrel. Weather seals are fitted to the mount and barrel joints, but not around the front element. High-tech glass includes four high-refractive, two ED (Extra-low Dispersion) and three aspherical elements.
Centre-sharpness is excellent, and still good at the corners of the frame. Resistance to colour fringing, ghosting and flare is similarly impressive. Barrel distortion is remarkably low considering the angle of view.
We did however find the electronic diaphragm control of our Canon-fit test sample lens was prone to exposure inaccuracies, causing images to become progressively darker as we stopped down through the aperture range.
(Image credit: Future)
Lab tests
We run a range of lab tests under controlled conditions, using the Imatest Master testing suite. Photos of test charts are taken across the range of apertures and zooms (where available), then analyzed for sharpness, distortion and chromatic aberrations.
We use Imatest SFR (spatial frequency response) charts and analysis software to plot lens resolution at the centre of the image frame, corners and mid-point distances, across the range of aperture settings and, with zoom lenses, at four different focal lengths. The tests also measure distortion and color fringing (chromatic aberration).
Centre-frame sharpness is outstanding, especially wide open, which is no mean feat for any lens. Edge sharpness appears more mediocre, but ultrawide lenses usually struggle when shooting our flat lens testing charts at relatively close range. Corner sharpness is more respectable when shooting real-world subjects at a more typical distance.
Fringing is noticeable at the edges of frame, but we'd expect this for an ultrawide lens, and the amount of chromatic aberration is by no means distracting.
Distortion: -3.55
Barrel distortion is visible but is fairly well-controlled, given the ultra-wide viewing angle.
Verdict
If you're after a premium wide-angle lens for a full-frame Canon, Nikon, or Pentax DSLR, but don't fancy paying the premium price tags to get an own-brand lens, the Irix 11mm Blackstone is a sound buy (with the option of the even cheaper Irix 11mm f/4 Firefly if you need something even more affordable).
Image quality, build and handling are excellent - the only drawback is you may need to be prepared to make some exposure corrections if the experience we had with our sample lens turns out not to be an isolated issue.
Matthew Richards is a photographer and journalist who has spent years using and reviewing all manner of photo gear. He is Digital Camera World's principal lens reviewer – and has tested more primes and zooms than most people have had hot dinners!
His expertise with equipment doesn’t end there, though. He is also an encyclopedia when it comes to all manner of cameras, camera holsters and bags, flashguns, tripods and heads, printers, papers and inks, and just about anything imaging-related.
In an earlier life he was a broadcast engineer at the BBC, as well as a former editor of PC Guide.
